The Road to Civil War - 1820-1861

Biblical Symbols Of Modern Day America - 2025 Words

Mythological symbols play an important role in the American legal system from the courtrooms to the Supreme Court of the United States. Myths serve an intelligent purpose, and help guide the legal institutions and the individual actions of people. These symbols also serve as a reminder to live a life dedicated to being a just person and live with integrity. Additionally, they remind people that myths have an important role in handing down traditions and encouraging the younger generation to accept and be guided by them. This supports a widely held belief that modern culture has a need to believe in a greater good, and the legal system of modern day America is greatly influence by mythological symbols. In Greek history, there were†¦show more content†¦When people enter a courtroom they are met with the formal decorum of the room. A judge sits in front of the state seal, which is surround by a circular glow like a halo. The halo is a mythological representation of a sain t or divine entity. For a living person, the halo is representative of the sanctity of that individual, to mark their importance in the setting. Sitting up on a pedestal where he can look down and pass a judgement on the case before him, the judge has a gavel by his hand, like a septor of the gods that gives one authority Around the courtroom one may see symbols such as books and scrolls, representing knowledge (books) and the tablets of laws handed down through time and history. Sitting next to the judge on his bench, is the figure of the Scales of Justice. Theses scales are representational of the weighing in on a decision of two sides of a dispute and the deliverance of an impartial judgment. It is common to see a feminine figure holding these scales, and she is a representation of both Themis and Justica. Themis, the Goddess of Justice, has been referred to by several names in ancient cultures, and has been said to have assisted Osiris in judging the dead by using the we ight of their hearts. Justica, was one of four Virtues in Roman mythology. The women represent the goddesses of divine justice. The opulence of the courtroom can lend a feeling of transcendence to the environment and reduce the effect of

Obligation of Paying Tax on Rental Income †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Obligation of Paying Tax on Rental Income. Answer: Introduction: The study currently is being considered for ascertainment of the residential status of Jack who visited Australia German passport from the year 2007 until the year of 2016, on which year he got the permit for residing and working within Australia. From all of these situations this can be stated that Jack has worked as Marine engineer in Australia during this period. The purpose of taxation is to fist identify if the person is Australian or foreigner. According to the taxation ruling of TR 98/D1, this can be stated that one-person Australia can be considered as the occupant for satisfying the purpose of tax[1]. These ruling are proper for a good number of people that enters Australia as well as this consider prearranged employment contracts. According to the current situation of Jack, this is identified that Jack has worked under this contract policies. In contrast with these elaborations, Jacks situation is considered as matter of element for making it chief conditions that defines compulsion to the Australian income tax. This chief condition is being elaborated within this context for making the context of Jacks right for being an occupant in Australia. Along with this, Australian income tax is also considered to be prioritized as per law for Jack. As held in the case of FC of T v. Applegate 79 ATC 4307; (1907) events for following the time of returns might be helpful in establishing a residential status of individual[2]. As stated in section 995-1 of the ITAA 1936 an Australian corresponds to one individual that occupies Australian taxation system. Jack was present in Australian from 2007 until 2016 that is continuous nine years during this period, only for nine months Jack was not present in Australia for employment purpose[3]. The current situation of Jack is now considering the residential status of Jack that is elaborated as follows; Domicile is known as a lawful theory for ascertaining the Domicile Act 1982 along with the common law rules have made situations that created the ground of private global laws. According to common rule, every individual from a country have the domicile related to their origin from their birth. Whereas there are some exception to this rules. As held in the case of Henderson v. Henderson [1965] 1 All E.R.179 an individual will be have the right to retain residence in their origin only exception is that those individual will be able to choose their residence in different nation according to the operation of law. Likewise, as evident from the current situation of Jack this can be elaborated that in spite of holding the German Passport he was staying in Australia with his family from 2007 to 2016. According to the case R v. Hammond (1852) 117 E.R. 1477 it can be stated that Jack can be considered as an Australian resident as his surrounding place was Australia from 2007 to the end of 2016. Jack stayed for nine years with his family within Australia that made him an occupant for Australias law and income tax laws under different facts that are prioritized in income taxation laws for Australia. As per the 183days test, one person who has been living in Australia for a period greater than half of the financial year either in breaks or continuously, that person might be considered to have productive dwelling within Australia and also have permanent place for abiding out of Australia. This is clarified from the elaborated situation that an assertion can be bought against Jack that he has been present in Australia for more than half of financial year which made him one Australian according to law. He was out of Australia only for nine months for employment purpose and returned to Australia for termination of employment[4]. Therefore, this can be stated that the government of Australia have the right to consider Jack as an occupant of Australia under the 183 days as he was present there for 183 continuous days. The superannuation test makes the sure that Australian employees are working at the Australian post overseas and should be treated as Australian residents. As this is clear from the existing scenario, this is observed that Jack was employed for an Australian post and worked overseas for more than a period of nine months. Therefore, because of these facts, as a result of this Jack will be considered as an Australian occupant according to the Superannuation test. As a general rule, a person that leaves Australia either temporarily would be considered to be an Australian resident provided that the person had acquired the residence in another country either by choice or due to the operations of law. As evident in the current state of affairs of Jack who is employed in china and receives his salary in bank account of Australia. Furthermore, Jack has also invested in the shares in Australia with bank account in Australia. Hence, the salary received by Jack in the bank account of Australia would be liable for taxation. As stated under Section 6-5 (1) of the ITAA 1997 income in accordance with the ordinary concepts comprises of those income which is derived in accordance with the ordinary concepts will be treated as ordinary income[5]. An individual who is a resident of Australia having their taxable income would be included in the ordinary income which a person derives earns directly or indirectly from all the sources weather inside or outside of Australia in the income year. The remuneration earned by Jack from his service in china was received by him in Australian bank account and will be treated for assessment under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. The present study is based on the understanding the consequences of tax for Eliza Tower that is related with several transactions which has been incurred in the present year of income. It is noticed from the circumstances of Eliza she has received a dividend which were completely franked from the global AIH. In addition to this, Eliza has also received rental income from the lease of her Australian residence. The Australian taxation office has defined that dividends are usually taxed based on the circumstances whether or not the shareholder is the Australian dweller or non-dweller of Australia[6]. The situation of Eliza states that she has received a fully franked dividend from the Global AIH, which is regarded as the Australian organization. An Australian resident firm that has taken the decision of joining the imputation system of Australia may credit the shareholder with the franked dividend. As has been found in the present study the receipt of dividends by Eliza in completely franked as the full amount of dividend carries franking credit. Eliza is treated as non-resident of Australia since she will be residing outside of Australia for a span of five years[7]. As a rule, Eliza being a non-resident of Australia the amount of franked dividend received by Global AIH is an exempted income together with the withholding amount of tax. Eliza will be disallowed to any franking tax offset relating to the franked amount of dividends received. Therefore, Eliza will not be permitted to use the amount of franking credit to reduce tax which is outstanding on other income derived in Australia and would not be entitled to any tax refund from franking credit. On the other side it was found that Eliza received rental income from her property which was leased in Australia. The Australian taxation office defines that an individual receiving rental income by renting out their property would be required to keep their records and should determine the expenses that can be claimed as permissible deductions[8]. As a general rule, a taxpayer is under obligation of paying tax on the rental income generated from the rental property and must report income in their tax return. Similarly, the receipt of rental income from her residence which is leased in Australia and she did not occur any expense in generating such income. Therefore, the rental income generated from the lease of property would be included in the tax return and will be liable for tax. A person can bring forward the claim of an allowable deductions for the amount of interest charged on the money which is borrowed by Eliza to purchase shares in Global AIH and other related investments through which a person generates taxable income. In the current situation of Eliza, it can be stated that she loaned out a sum of $100,000 to acquire shares. Because of this, she incurs $5650 as interest expense and she can allowable deductions under section 8-5 of ITAA 1997[9]. The expenses incurred by Eliza was for generating the taxable income and as a result, she would be allowed allowable deductions under the act. Reference List: Barkoczy, S,Foundations of taxation law 2014. in . Braithwaite, Valerie, ed.Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion. Routledge, 2017. Coleman, C, K Sadiq,Principles of taxation law 2013. in . Graetz, M, D Schenk,Federal income taxation. in . Grange, J, G Jover-Ledesma, G Maydew,2014 principles of business taxation. in . Kenny, P,Australian tax 2013. in , Chatswood, N.S.W., LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013. Morgan, A, C Mortimer, D Pinto,A practical introduction to Australian taxation law. in , North Ryde [N.S.W.], CCH Australia, 2013. Woellner, R, S Barkoczy, S Murphy, C Evans, D Pinto,Australian taxation law 2014. in . Woellner, R,Australian taxation law 2012. in , North Ryde [N.S.W.], CCH Australia, 2013.

Securing the blessing of liberty Essay Example

Securing the blessing of liberty Paper â€Å"Securing the blessings of liberty† was an idea initiated by the framers. To start, the essay will focus on defining and elaborating more concerning the idea. Securing the blessing of liberty was an idea initialized after the American Revolution. The blessings that the framers are talking about, represent the rights that they had acquired after fighting during the American Revolution (Edwards 78).The framers were tired of the tyranny rule and as a result, they fought to oppose the rule of the British. By the term ‘securing’, the framers meant that they wanted these rights not only for themselves, but also for the future generations. The freedoms and rights were protected after the amendment of the constitution. The constitution was amended in such a way that it accommodated the bills of rights, which was a combination of several freedoms and liberties such as, the freedom of religion, among others. The constitution stipulated that the congress did not have sole power to amend or tamper with the bill of rights. The constitution was also amended in such a way that it automatically assumed that people had acquired the rights from the creator, therefore not even the congress had the ability to snatch these rights away from the people. These two amendments ensured total protection of freedoms, rights, and liberties of the people. Ways in which the idea related to the understanding of the framer’s role and the government structure We will write a custom essay sample on Securing the blessing of liberty specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Securing the blessing of liberty specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Securing the blessing of liberty specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This chapter will focus on ways in which the idea brought about understanding among the framers, concerning their role and the structure of the government. To start, the essay will look at how the idea brought understanding upon the framers concerning their roles. After which, the essay will elaborate on the understanding of the government structure. The idea brought about the concept of equality. That every man (woman inclusive), had equal rights. These rights were equal because they were all created by one God who bestowed these rights upon creation. Therefore, the idea made the framer’s feel that it was their role to fight for the equality of all people. The struggle for equity began during the American Revolution and continued all through until the framers formed the constitution and introduced the republican form of government. The formation of the republican government and the constitution, marked the beginning of equity among the people, regardless of status, rank, and race among many others. The idea revolved around matters concerning rights, freedoms, and liberties of the people. After struggling under the British rule for a long time, the idea made the framers feels that it was their role to safeguard and protect the rights , freedoms, and liberties of the people, from manipulation by the government. The framers took it upon themselves to come up with a constitution and a republican form of government (a government for the people by the people. These two aspects (constitution and the republican structure) ensured that the rights, freedoms, and liberties were protected (Dysart 95). This idea enabled the framers to understand more concerning the structure of the government. The idea was based on equality that manifested itself in form of rights, freedoms, and liberties. The idea also worked towards securing these liberties for the future generations. Having this in mind, the framers understood that the republican and the democratic government structureswere suitable at the moment. The framers understood that by implementing the republic structure, the people would voice their opinions through voting hence, giving them an opportunity to express themselves. The framers also understood that the republican structure would also represent the minority in that, the representatives would also be assigned in accordance to the population of the districts. Therefore, the framers enacted the republican and democratic structures (Christopher 97). American political culture and the basic tenets of American democracy The American political culture contains core ideal and values. These ideals and values include liberty, equality, democracy, individualism, unity, and diversity. The American political culture dwells on these values and ideals and on ways to achieve each of them. The American government relied on these values, and used them to ensure proper governance. After a long period of living under the British rule, the framers felt that there was need for change. This explained the cause of the American Revolution. After achieving independence (acquired through struggle and sacrifice), the framers established a republican and democratic government that contained the key values and ideal cores mentioned above, to prevent the reoccurrence of the dictatorial rule (as it had been under the British governance). The American democracy was made up of certain basic tenets. These tenets include, individual worth, equity, individual freedom, popular sovereignty, majority rule, minority rights, limited government, religious freedom, and compromise. These tenets acted as the foundation of democracy, they (the tenets) helped define democracy and show what it entailed. Democracy helped to preserve the rights, liberties, and freedoms of the people, with the help of these tenets. Through these tenets of democracy, the framers were able to â€Å"secure the blessing† for themselves and for future generations (Bimber 98). References Bimber, Bruce Allen. Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Dysart, Christopher Ward. Securing the Blessings of Liberty. . Louis U. Pub. L. Rev.6 (1987): 341. Edwards Jr, James R. Securing the Blessings of Liberty. Center for Immigration Studies (2011). Sullivan, John L., James Piereson, and George E. Marcus. American democracy. University of Chicago Press, 1993.

King Lear Essays (1598 words) - Stock Characters, King Lear, Jester

King Lear In the play King Lear there are many characters and they all have their own roles. Some roles are more obvious than others. The one that catches my attention the most is the role of the Fool. In the dictionary the definition of a fool is someone who lacks sense or judgement. Does the Fool lack sense or judgement? Or is he the opposite and everyone just perceives him as a fool. These questions come down into one ultimate question, was the Fool a madman or a prophet. Personally I think that he was a prophet. The Fool knew every outcome of the King's decisions. Since the Fool was not taken seriously everyone just disregarded him. This leads me to believe that the Fool was not as foolish as people thought. Besides bringing "foolishness" to the play the Fool also brought irony. He was the smartest person in the play but was treated as the stupidest. How ironic is it that by the middle of the play the king was loosing his mind and the Fool was giving him advice. The ironic theme of the play makes the irony of the Fool more prevalent. His irony made the reader more inclined to understand and realize how far from foolish he really was. I think that the Fool also had the role of being the voice of reality in Lear's life. The King let the Fool say whatever he wanted because he was "crazy". This gave the Fool the opportunity to say what he wanted and no matter how crazy it sounded. The King didn't take his advice but he listened. The Fool gave the king what he needed, clarity and reason. He gave the King a new perspective on things, too bad it was a little late because the damage had been done, the King had lost his power. The Fool came into the play after the King divided up his kingdom. The placement of the Fool in the play is important. The Fool comes in after the King's daughters had already thought up their evil plan. Also the Fool leaves the play when the King is safe with Kent and Cordelia. This leads me to believe that the Fool is like a safety blanket for the King. He is there for him in his times of need but when he is not in trouble the Fool is not there. The Fool looks out for the King's best interest. The Fool thinks very highly of himself, even though no one else does. The comments he makes lead the reader to believe that he knows he is right. Even though I know he is right the characters in the play don't and treat him disrespectfully. In the Fool's first speech he says, "Have more than you should, speak less than you know and lend less than you need". This quote can be taken two ways. The Fool can be speaking about the King saying that he should have more because he doesn't have anything including his daughters and his kingdom. The King also should not be so trusting and not be so giving. If he was less trusting and giving then maybe he wouldn't have gotten taken advantage of. These to me are true about the King. This quote can also be directed toward the Fool. He has more than people think he should be, to them he speaks less than they know and he only gives a little. This is also true about the fool. Although the Fool is probably talking about the King and the mess that he made but he could also be directing the statement toward himself. The Fool has an insight that others don't see. One example of this is he knows that Goneril and Reagan are really evil people. He knows they lie and do not like them because of that. He says, "they'll have me whipped for speaking true". The Fool knows the extent of their meanness and also knows that the King does not see it. The Fool realizes that Goneril and Reagan will take over the whole kingdom and leave nothing left for the King. This makes them corrupt and the Fool lets them know that he does not like them. He tells Goneril to her face that he is better than she is for what she had planned. Of course him telling Goneril this means nothing because he is "Just the Fool." The Fool has many roles in this play. I

Drood Analysis essays

Drood Analysis essays While watching a performance of *BANG* The Mystery *BANG**BANG* of Edwin Drood *BANG* the work of the director was quite clear. I often have trouble trying to determine how much of an influence the director actually has on a production by observing acting choices and design choices. What made the directorial choices so clear was the unison of the production. All of the choices fit so well together that a well-informed audience member easily saw the directors work. One of the more interesting design choices that I noticed early on was the lack of sufficient masking. The black curtains hanging on each end of the stage barely hid the double doors to the well-lit stairwell from the audiences vision. Whenever any actor walked through the double doors, the audience was distracted for an instant and reminded that they were attending a show; a performance. This seemed to be a recurring theme throughout the night and seemed to be large part of the directors concept. The next scenic design choice that tied in well was the fact that the flats were all just a little to small in width. As an audience member, I was allowed to see the edges of scenery and into areas that should have been forbidden. Set pieces that werent in use were sometimes visible through the cracks as well as stagehands, and fire extinguishers; actors getting into place and waiting for their cues were often seen in the wings. These specifics also tied in well with the directors concept and interpretation. They really werent all that distracting and only reinforced the feeling of a live performance at a music hall. Along the same lines was the use of footlights. Of course, the script makes a direct reference to an actor not appearing up here under the footlights but such a line could be considered an expression like in the lime light. The poorly covered footlights often shined in the eyes...

Cancellation of U.S. Air Force Tanker Program Essay

Cancellation of U.S. Air Force Tanker Program - Essay Example The program however has difficulty getting off the ground and had undergone several calls for Requests for Proposals (RFPs) as controversies and contentious issues regarding contracts and acquisitions had long riddled. In 2004, the program was compelled to shut down when the main players in the negotiation were revealed to be involved in highly unethical issues and in 2008, the program was re-shelved one more time as one of the parties in the negotiations filed a bidding protest with GAO. At present, the AF prepares for its third attempt to hold a bidding of the project. The US Air Force tankers are aircrafts whose primary function is to refuel other aircrafts like fighters, bombers, surveillance aircrafts and other planes used by the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps while those aircrafts are airborne. The importance of the tankers is that they obviously give US aircrafts power even beyond US borders because they allow these aircrafts to go longer distances and prolong their airborne time. Aerial fueling capability therefore is of critical importance to the country to sustain its superior aerial firefighting and firepower capability in the world (O’Rourke 2009 1). The present tanker fleet of the US Air Force consists of 453 KC-135 Stratotankers (see Fig. 1) built by Boeing, many of which were acquired by the Air Force (AF hereafter) as early as 1957 with the latest batch acquired in 1967. The average age of the Stratotankers is 47 years old. A much younger model, the KC-10 was also acquired by the AF in 1981 but there are only 59 of them (O’Rourke 2009 2-3). US policymakers had been concerned with the ageing state of the Stratotankers since the 1990s but it wan in 2002 that concrete steps were taken to remedy the situation. US Congress passed the Leasing Authority Act 2002 which authorized the AF to lease 100 Boeing 767s for a period not more than ten years and modify them into aerial fuel tankers. The